Practise Interview Questions

There is nothing worse in an interview than being unable to think of a response to a question. The pressure is already high and you know that your silence is not impressing anyone. The longer it lasts, the more difficult it is to think of an answer, until finally you can’t even remember what the question was.

If this happens, just ask them to repeat the question, but the best way to avoid it is to have pre-prepared answers.

Academic interviews are not always like interviews for other jobs. They tend to focus more on the research you have done as well as the research you would be doing, so make sure you are an expert on both. Look into the techniques the interviewers use and make sure you can describe them if questioned.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. Don’t ignore conventional interview questions. Think about your strengths and weaknesses before you enter the interview.
  2. Use the internet to research potential questions, and ask your supervisor the sort of things they might ask.
  3. If they ask you about your weaknesses, don’t say you don’t have any. Pick something that would not inhibit your ability to do the job, and show how you overcame it.
  4. Prepare examples of times you achieved things against the odds. Examples of team work, independent thought, and idea generation are also important.
  5. If you can come up with ideas of the direction you might take the project, this will be impressive.
  6. Never assume they already know your skills from your CV and cover letter. Repeat what you can do and add to it as much as possible.
  7. If there are specific advantages to hiring you over someone else, then state them. Don’t assume they are implied.
  8. If they tell you about their research, don’t just passively listen and nod, occasionally muttering how interesting it all is. Interrupt with questions and ideas that demonstrate you have knowledge about the subjects.
  9. Think up alternative techniques you could use to do the research you are applying for. They may ask questions about them, and if not you can suggest these alternatives.
  10. Don’t simply state that you can do things. Offer experiences that show you can do them.
 
Read Personal Perspective
 
I have always struggled with interviews, and this is mostly because I find them difficult to prepare for. As they are without a syllabus and are generally short, it seems as if there is anything (and only so much) they could ask, thus making preparation pointless.

However, they always ask the same questions. They want to know primarily that you understand the techniques you would be using in their group, and that you have a good understanding of the surrounding science. Solid research into these areas will be beneficial.

Tailor Your CV and Cover Letter to the Job

Using a generic CV that lists a bunch of irrelevant skills and achievements just shows your potential employer that you don’t care about the job. The more effort you put into your application the more likely they are to accept you.

Spending more time on applications might mean you apply for fewer jobs, but likely the ones you cut out are the ones you are less likely to get.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. In your cover letter, make sure you write down all the skills you possess in the essential and desirable criteria, giving examples where possible of how you achieved them.
  2. Although putting more effort into fewer applications is more sensible than spamming multiple potential employers, don’t write only one high quality application and assume you’ll get the job. They may have internal candidates, or someone even more qualified might apply.
  3. Link the paragraphs of your cover letter so that they fit together into a coherent story.
  4. Talk about your own research and how it links to your potential employer’s research, paying particular detail to the overlap.
  5. Prove in the cover letter that you have read your potential employer’s papers by discussing them.
  6. If you know the subject area well enough you could suggest ideas of where you might take the research.
  7. Discuss your interest in their subject area in the cover letter and give any examples that evidence this.
  8. Read your CV and cover letter through several times on different days before sending them off. Make sure they read fluently. If possible, have a friend or family member check them over.
 
Read Personal Perspective
 

The first few jobs I applied for, I didn’t realise there was a further details link at the bottom of the job description page. Obviously, I got none of these jobs because my CV and cover letter were not as attuned to the job description as the people who knew more thoroughly what the job was about.

The CV and cover letter is all about showing that you have thought about the job, are interested in the subject matter, and proving that you have the specific skills to do it well.

Plan Your Procedures

One of the main differences between a successful and unsuccessful research student is that the former plans their work intricately.

It cannot be stressed too clearly: Planning = success.

You don’t want to get half way through a procedure before you realise you don’t know what you’re doing, or worse that don’t have the necessary equipment/permissions to finish it. This wastes your time and resources.

For all procedures, each step should be laid out in a document before starting the experiment, and it is helpful to have a virtual and printed copy.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. Don’t think of time spent planning as time you could spend doing additional replicates of the procedure. Planned work moves so much faster and more fluidly that you will most likely save time, and won’t just produce a heap of bad data.
  2. If you alter the protocol, don’t just scribble the alteration in your rough notes, but make sure the original protocol is adapted. Be sure you know which version of the protocol corresponds to which results. Otherwise, even if you don’t forget the changes entirely, you will forget whether they helped.
  3. If there is a protocol already written, read it through beforehand, checking you understand each step.
  4. Once you have a plan, don’t just follow it mindlessly. It is entirely possible you made a mistake, or something in the published protocol is not applicable to your work. Stay vigilant and make changes where necessary.
 
Get Wet Lab Tips
 

  1. At the start of each protocol there should be a list of things you need to do before you start such as: booking machines or rooms, turning things on, setting things up, or getting things out of the fridge or freezer so they are ready to use.
  2. Check you have all the reagents/equipment you need before you start, especially if they are communal, and check they have not expired.
  3. The best plans don’t just give qualitative information like names, but also the quantities like timings, volumes and container sizes if applicable.
  4. Sometimes kits come with a quick protocol. Make sure you read the full protocol first. The quick protocol is for people who already know what they are doing.
  5. Plan experiments as early as possible, so that if you need to order things or book things it will not cause large delays.
  6. Remember to factor your controls into your plans. Sometimes controls need extra equipment or reagents which you may not have on the day of the procedure if you don’t plan.
 
Read Personal Perspective
 
It is still irritating to think about all the time I wasted by forgetting to book machines or pre-warm reagents so they were ready when I needed them. My experiments would sit around waiting for people to finish, or for me to find new reagents as the ones I usually used were empty or expired. Whether these delays were responsible for bad data I will never know, but one of the main reasons planning leads to good data is that it helps you to keep the protocol as constant as possible between replicates.

Plan Your Time

Separate your work out into all the individual projects you are doing at the same time. If you are only doing one, then break it up into sub-projects.

Plan ahead for each project you are doing, making sure you do not oversubscribe your time with too many large procedures on the same day. Allocate time for planning and analysing and this will prevent you from rushing things, and allow you to book rooms or machines earlier.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. Use a computer to make your plan (rather than a paper planner) as it will make it much easier to alter when you inevitably need to make changes. Excel or google calendar are possibilities.
  2. You could make up your own colour code system like the example shown below. An important note is the number of large procedures you are doing, so that you can ensure you do not have too many on any single day. If you do, then you can probably rearrange one.
  3. Each day, note down exactly what experiments you have to do for that day in your notebook, and then you can tick off the items as you complete them. This will stop you going home with an incomplete list.
  4. Remember to allow time to analyse your data.

Planning Time

 
Read Personal Perspective
 
When I started planning not just my individual procedures but the time I allocated between each of them, the quality of my work greatly increased. It removed the stress of finding someone else had booked rooms or machines I needed, and allowed me to space the work out so I wasn’t working until midnight trying to fit three big procedures into a single day. I only wish I started doing this earlier.

Organise Your Lab/Note Book

Make sure you have the main protocol written up and visible whilst you carry out the procedure. You will probably also have a notebook for rough notes.

The mistake is to assume you will never need to look at these again. Most likely you will, at least for some of them. So don’t jot numbers and names down with no reference to what they mean. Put a date and title at the top and use comprehensible language to show what each bit describes. It doesn’t have to be full sentences as long as you still understand it in five days’ time.

Not only will this help you remember which sample/individual corresponds to which data set, but it will also help you analyse mistakes, or find where changes might have improved the procedure.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. Don’t ever use loose bits of paper. They get lost.
  2. Date everything, including your electronic files and rough calculations.
  3. Write down any changes you make to procedures, so that if the outcome changes you have some possible explanations.
 
Read Personal Perspective
 
I did some experiments where I had to add about 10 different inhibitors to cells and work out the best concentrations for each. Each time I scrawled down the values for each inhibitor without labels. I knew at the time which was which, but a few weeks after when I came to analyse it, this information had long since departed me. It was stressful and time consuming to work out which concentrations I had used for which drug at which time.

Organise Your Results

Analysing results can be boring. The experiment is basically complete and you want it out of the way as soon as possible. However, it is likely that even if the results are bad you will be back one day staring at the spreadsheet trying to interpret what it all meant.

When you write papers or your thesis you won’t remember which of your myriad spreadsheets are the ones you want. Therefore, it is best to keep a consistent layout across projects and title every column and row so they are instantly recognisable when you return to them.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. In Excel, keep a copy of all your graphs on a separate sheet (not a separate document), which should be labelled graphs. Then you can instantly see if a spreadsheet contains good data or not.
  2. Label all your graphs with the maximum amount of information. Don’t leave the axis as x or y or % Change. They are meaningless. Write exactly what you measured in the axes.
  3. Try as much as possible to utilise (and title) different sheets (again NOT different documents) for different tables of data. If you have to scroll through thousands of lines of data with other tables beneath and to the side, it quickly becomes uninterpretable.
 
Read Personal Perspective
 
My bane was always the unlabelled graph. I would even show them to my supervisor and he’d just look at me blankly and say, “What does it mean?” At the time it was obvious to me as I’d just done it, but he – and myself in the future – had no idea. It’s so quick to label an axis, and it takes so long to interpret one that isn’t labelled. When I wrote my thesis I discovered this, but it was too late by then.

Link Your Work

Before computers, linking work was easy as everything had to be written up in the same lab book. Now we have Microsoft Word and Excel documents; other stats packages; internet sources; data on many different machines; and manufacturers protocols, all on top of our hand written lab books and notebooks.

This mishmash of paper and virtual documents makes for an organisational nightmare, and requires some thought to be organised so that it is of any use.

As much as possible keep all data about one project together. When this is not possible, one mechanism is to use an acronym of the project title which identifies all your work to the project it belongs to.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. On your computer, divide your research up into folders for each project, labelling each folder with the project acronym. Store all your data and protocols relevant to that project in that folder.
  2. For each replicate add a number to the acronym, and make folders for each replicate within the project folder. Make sure you write the outcome and the reason for doing the replicate on the results. You could even add a one letter identifier to the file name so you can quickly see whether it contains good data, “G” or bad data, “B”.
  3. Date everything, as this provides a failsafe for linking bits of work on different computers, or from computers to lab and notebooks.
  4. Copy all data off communal machines as soon as possible.
 
Read Personal Perspective
 
When it came to writing my thesis, I spent ages trawling through data with incomprehensible file names. Many of my graphs were already in journal papers, but some of them needed subtle changes and others had disappeared from the stats software, so they needed to be done again. Some of these sets of data were almost three years old, and I’d long forgotten what it all meant. If I’d put it all in separate folders with succinct file names it would have taken a fraction of the time to remake those graphs.

Label Everything

Every lab throughout every country in the world contains thousands of tubes storing mystery liquids and solids, which are useless and potentially dangerous.

Computers are cluttered with folders and files that might as well read, “never_open_this_again.file” because the unlabelled content is meaningless to anyone but its long departed creator.

Label everything as precisely as you can. Make sure it contains the project name/acronym, the date, replicate number, and any other info required to identify it.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. Think about your labels for more than the minimum number of seconds. If you have just written a few words, then you will probably have missed something.
  2. Date everything. If all else fails, the date may still save you.
  3. When you date your files on computer, write them backwards, starting with the year then the month and then the day, so the computer will automatically put your files in chronological order.
  4. Computers have lots of memory, so write accordingly long file names. You can never have too much information immediately visible.
  5. Even if you are only using something for a few minutes, it is still worth labelling. You could drop things or mix them up, and the briefest loss of concentration could otherwise leave you unable to continue.
  6. Keep all the datasheets of the products you order in a draw, separate from everything else.
  7. For papers, copy and paste the whole title into the Save As.
 
Get Wet Lab Tips
 

  1. If the tube is too small to label properly, put it in a bag and label that.
  2. If the material is difficult to write on, write on a piece of paper and then stick that on.
  3. Be careful you don’t label liquid containing tubes with pens that will dissolve in the solvent.
 
Read Personal Perspective
 
I once did a proteomics study where I labelled each tube in a red pen only to find that the alcohol in the tubes had spilled through the holes in the tops and leached the pen back in with it. The result was a series of tubes with varying degrees of pink in them, and the uncertainty as to whether the degree of pinkness had affected the results.

Store Your Journal Papers Wisely

Everyone likes to read things on paper rather than on the computer, but the truth is that there are huge downsides to storing papers this way:

  • They are easily lost
  • They are difficult to organise
  • They form needless clutter

It makes much more sense to store all your papers on the computer, and there are several programs available for doing so. You can highlight and make notes about papers just as you can do by hand, with the benefit that there are search boxes to locate papers and information within papers.

Get Practical Tips
 

  1. Every paper you want to read or reference later should be saved as a PDF on your computer before you add it to a library such as Readcube, Mendeley or Endnote. If your other libraries get deleted or overwritten – which can happen – then you at least have all the PDFs.
  2. Save the PDFs with the full title of the article, not just an abbreviation or vague description, and organise your folders by topic so you can see what papers you have read in each area of your research.
  3. You can always print them out to read, but if you intend to refer to them later a virtual copy is advisory. One exception is when there are bits of protocols that you might want to cut out and stick in your lab book.
 
Read Personal Perspective
 
I printed out most of the papers I wanted to read, and most never got read, which was pretty wasteful. Beyond that, the stacks of papers for my thesis were stored in piles in my room, numbered so that I could just write (ref 10) and not interrupt the flow of writing. When it came to putting in all the references, I thought I could just sit down in front of Breaking Bad and plug them in.

WRONG.

I still don’t know how, but several of them had gone missing, and other times I had written down the wrong reference number in my thesis. Referencing took a whole lot longer than it would have if I had both used electronic documents and referenced as I wrote.

Research is Unpredictable

Probably the most frustrating thing about science is that it doesn’t work.

Sometimes it never works. You spend months trying to make something work and have no more success than a flying squirrel attempting to glide across the Atlantic.

Sometimes it does work. Then despite the fact that you haven’t changed anything it suddenly stops working and no matter what you do, you can’t replicate what you did before.

IT’S OK. THESE THINGS HAPPEN TO EVERYONE.

See Examples
 

  • Machines may break down for months on end, before a technician finally describes how much it will cost to buy a new machine.
  • Software may freeze and you’ll have to repeat days of work redoing your analysis. Or a power cut will end your complicated procedure in the middle, causing everything to be lost.
  • Volunteers may cancel their appointment for the 50th time in a row, or they may simply drop out.
  • Ethics or safety boards may take months considering whether to give you approval, and then decline it.
 
Get Practical Tips
 

  1. Check the internet to see if other people had the same problem and what solutions they found.
  2. Save your work regularly. Don’t wait for your first major loss of data before you take this advice.
  3. Don’t assume someone else will fix or order something. Chances are they are thinking the same thing about you.
  4. Back up your results either using the university intranet or on several computers
 
Get Wet Lab Practical Tips
 

  1. If a procedure still isn’t working after a few attempts, then don’t simply continue repeating it under the assumption that you did something wrong. Make sure you consciously change one aspect.
  2. Don’t leave important data on shared machines. Always copy it to your own personal machines ASAP. It may crash, or other people may delete your files.
  3. A primary reason experiments suddenly stop working is because one of the reagents has expired. If the components are cheap it is best to make up new solutions for all of them and try again. Order new stocks if you have to and double check your calculations. If the materials are expensive, try changing one or two at a time.
  4. If an experiment has never worked, try new solutions but also change the parameters one at a time.
  5. Always be aware of the mechanical impact. There are different ways of following a protocol: It could also be that you are being too gentle with mixing solutions, or too rough with components that can be damaged such as living material.
  6. Never assume a rough estimate is ok. When it comes to timing and concentrations, always be as exact as possible. Sometimes this is all it takes to turn a failed experiment into a successful one.
 
Read Dry Lab Personal Perspective
 
You would think it would be easy enough to get 50 people to fill out a questionnaire. Nope. Even once I had ethics approval it was an uphill battle to get people to fill them in.

I got about half way to my target and then suddenly the influx just stopped. I couldn’t get anyone else to save my life. The avenues I’d been using were simply exhausted, so I had to find new avenues.

My advice is not to assume the methods you are using will provide an unlimited supply of people. Think of other ways to attract volunteers.

 
Read Wet Lab Personal Perspective
 
It is universally acknowledged that in wet lab some protocols are more reliable than others. Some people can get the less reliable ones to work and others can’t. I couldn’t. I made up new solutions and tried different parameters, but it never seemed to work.

I was not spending enough time researching the protocol. When I looked at a protocol, I saw a list of stages, but the good researchers understood what each of those stages did.

They had researched the protocol and reagents so they knew what changes to make for it to work, whereas I was making uneducated guesses to alter parameters. I did the experiment more times, but each time they did it they improved it more.

For complicated procedures optimisation can still be a lengthy process, but if you do it right you will get there.