1. Go to Talks at Your University
2. Form Relationships with Other Students
3. Go to Conferences and Talk to People
When you first start out in research, going to presentations about people’s lab results is like listening to an alien trying to communicate by spraying you with its scent glands… though hopefully less odorous. The fastest way to make it more intelligible is to listen to more talks.
They will give you a much broader view of science than your fairly narrow scale project. You may find alternative techniques; phenomena that affect your work; materials that are better than the ones you use; and new directions your project could take.
It is a mistake to think you only need to focus on your project. Even if it works ok for your degree, changing topic afterward will be much harder.
Get Practical TipsThis doesn’t mean a trip down the pub or coffee shop with everyone after work – though that is great as well. It means understanding the projects and techniques that your friends and other students are doing. This will not only increase your understanding of scientific principles, but also reveal potential collaborations that might help you get onto other people’s papers and get them to do some work for your paper.
Very few students do this, but in the end the three things that will matter most to your success in academia are the number of papers you have, the number of techniques you can do, and the number of people you know. As a student, it will be difficult to form collaborations with big PIs, but collaborating with students is something you can do easily.
Get Practical TipsOne thing I did do was gain a few middle author papers by contributing my skills to other people’s projects, which was very useful.
The more people you know the easier you will find it to move on to your next post. Knowing other students is great, but the people you really need to know are the people who are in charge of projects and have their own funding. The best way to do this internally is to go to talks, and the best way to do this externally is to go to conferences.
Get Practical TipsSomething that a lot of students miss out on is the opportunity to go and learn new techniques outside their institute or university. The main way to do this is to go to workshops which specialise in teaching specific procedures and can last a day or several weeks. As these take place all over Europe, America and outside, this is also a good way to see new places and make new connections.
Putting these courses on your CV shows that you are motivated and more importantly that you have experience with more techniques and procedures.
It is a mistake to think that putting your head down and getting lots of data will definitely carry you through your degree. That is putting all your eggs in one basket, and science makes for some notoriously unreliable weaves. Learn things, enter competitions, and show yourself as a well-rounded individual to increase your chances of success.
Get Practical TipsAside from experiencing other places and things, these courses show potential employers that you are enthusiastic about learning and are active at pursuing it.
It doesn’t have to be called journal club, but attending a weekly meeting where you discuss scientific papers with other people will help your development a lot. Journal clubs are the best way to gain a feeling of how research is done outside your lab, which may not always be the optimal way.
General structure is that one person per week picks a paper and sends it to everyone else in the group. Everyone reads the paper before the meeting, and then the person who picked the paper chairs an informal discussion by going through the figures and the conclusions.
Get Practical TipsIf there was one activity I would recommend to anyone, it’s journal club. Seeing the differences between the high and low impact papers and analysing them in detail helped me avoid the same mistakes and improved the quality of my research.
This is one of the more equivocal guidelines as there are different schools of thought. There is something to be said for presenting reams of data at high speed – if you have reams of good data to show. Most of the audience won’t follow what you are talking about, or pay much interest in your data, but the ones that remember you will likely come away with the impression that you work hard and you probably know what you are doing.
On the other hand, fewer people will remember you. To the big PIs that you are hoping to impress, you are only interesting as far as your data are interesting, and they can’t be interested in something they can’t follow.
For this reason it is probably better to be slow and clear, presenting a smaller fraction of your project in a coherent story. Scientists enjoy stories and are much more likely to give you their attention if it looks like your data are leading to some conclusion.
Get Practical TipsThey needed a thorough introduction where they explained firstly the basics of the topic, and secondly the previous studies that led up to their work.
The more time you put into the introduction, the more the audience will care about your results.